|
Member Review : 03-Sep-2026 07:40 |
|
|
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
High Score BV-10006 |
| Rating: |
4.50 |
| Comment: |
Just so you know, I'm stealing this. Improvements have already been made.
There is a problem though. Endo family structures would take up 1 critical slot in the legs. (pg 212 Campaign Operations.) So you're technically illegal. Still, fitting in an extra TSEMP was brilliant. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 09-Aug-2026 02:48 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Headhunter (HHR-1A) |
| Rating: |
4.50 |
| Comment: |
This is the type of thing I was looking for in my search. Much like things I've designed. Its a tool that does the job, but it would be nice if it had a bit more personality. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 09-Aug-2026 02:42 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Indestructium |
| Rating: |
3.50 |
| Comment: |
The part of this mech that caught my attention is the void signature system. Which does nothing for a super heavy mech. That was funny on it's own. But the sparse fluff is also a good descriptor that I'm probably going to steal for my own use. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 02-Jul-2026 03:01 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Rakshasa ((Shapeshifter)) [BASE] |
| Rating: |
5.00 |
| Comment: |
Ok. I can see the vision for this design. I like the idea. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 18-Jun-2026 03:43 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Morticia MIA-69 |
| Rating: |
5.00 |
| Comment: |
Finally a record of The State's battlemech capabilities. The Mech is... very normal. Certainly a solid trooper mech for light engagements. It is light for its role by our standards.
The descriptor of the pilot program is interesting. Genetic Slavery is still evident, but at least these women seem to be treated more as people, unlike their sisters who end up in life support coffins on light vehicles. Our guess is the mechwarrior pilots came first, but were devalued as people as their population increased, leading to them becoming just commodities to install in cheap vehicles.
The use of Clones is perhaps not the brightest idea from their command. While the baseline pilot is no doubt capable, they will also have statistically relevant blind-spots in their thinking. This is potentially a flaw that could be exploited to shape engagements into a more cost effective victory. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 05-Jun-2026 16:12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 03-May-2026 05:35 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
The killer of fun |
| Rating: |
3.00 |
| Comment: |
The Chameleon System is functionally useless on this. All it does is take up space and add heat. There is also my usual complaint about a lack of fluff. Otherwise yep, it has many mech like qualities. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 28-Feb-2026 10:57 |
|
|
1 out of 1 users (100.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
High Score BV-9701 |
| Rating: |
4.00 |
| Comment: |
Ok, I see what you tried to do. Going for a frankenmech to try and edge out a few extra points of structure. Unfortunately, That makes the mech .5 tons overweight. Which is not showing on this readout, but is showing up when I attempt to recreate the mech. Bigger parts add mass. And unfortunately if that mass was available it would tend to be better to add more armor then structure.
Good and subtle attempt to raise the limit though. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 09-Sep-2025 10:40 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
HawkWolf HWK-5F |
| Rating: |
4.00 |
| Comment: |
Hawkwolf is just one of those designs I like. And this is a completely normal variant of it. I fully approve. Just wish there was at least some fluff explaining why or how it came to be. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 09-May-2025 19:23 |
|
|
1 out of 1 users (100.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Champion CHM-P1N |
| Rating: |
5.00 |
| Comment: |
I found the shenanigans involved with the movement profile to be suprising and funny. Very important traits IMO. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
