|
Member Review : 27-Sep-2008 14:19 |
|
|
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Lancer LNC-3R |
| Rating: |
4.50 |
| Comment: |
Very impressive for a 3025 era design.
Nice speed, good armor, and its weapons suit it's role very well especially for it's size.
It compares very well with other missle carriers of that time too, being able to support those elements with ease.
I just really like the combination of everything you get in this package. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 23-Sep-2008 23:17 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Pillager PLG-6ZX |
| Rating: |
3.00 |
| Comment: |
I like the reasoning behind the use of thunder munitions and multiple small launchers. It does sound somewhat Capellan. A decent mech that is pretty versatile as well.
That being said, I think this should have been done as a new design rather than a pillager. The weapons don't feel right and the TSM just feels out of place. Granted I'd rather be with them then without, especially with that stealth armor. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 23-Sep-2008 23:16 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Horseshoe Crab HRC-M2 |
| Rating: |
4.50 |
| Comment: |
I agree pretty much with everything the 'Sleeping Dragon' said in his review. Especially the comment about the LRM's.
That aside, I can't help but draw comparisons to the Scorpion. Similiar capabilites and weapons load but at a significant reduction in price and size. And with the improved speed, I'd prefer to use these over the scorpion in those "scout hunter" roles. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 23-Sep-2008 23:16 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Fusilier FSL-1A |
| Rating: |
2.50 |
| Comment: |
Too be honest, I have become quite a fan of your whole TDF series but this design isn't something I care for. Like how the vedette is for tanks, I feel the same way with this design. Effective but nothing special. (I'd prefer a centurion or an enforcer)
And IMO, I can't picture the dragon purchasing these from the TDF. A rank and file medium mech (a weight class which the DCMS generally disfavor) produced by a periphery nation. They feel superior to theif fellow houses I could only imagine how they feel about those who aren't even a member of the successor states.
Still the fact that both the TDF and DCMS mistrust the Davions so much, I guess that would provide some common ground. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 23-Sep-2008 23:16 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Grenadier GND-1A |
| Rating: |
3.50 |
| Comment: |
Fast and deadly. I am starting to notice a trend in your designs. (oher than the fact that they are all effective lol) and it's definitely a good one.
With all these great mechs at their disposal, it's a wonder why anyone even bothers to attack Concordat at all. |
| A topic has been started for this review [Read Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 23-Sep-2008 23:16 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Pathfinder PFR-1A |
| Rating: |
3.00 |
| Comment: |
This mech indeed makes sense. Well armored, fast, and mobile, it's certainly not bad. Especially for a scout.
I know we are dealing with lvl 1 tech but I just can't shake the distate of feeling unarmed. The weapons load is appropriate and all but it isn't one I care for.
Personal taste and all. My style of play is very offensive and on lights I can't help but prefer more firepower vs armor. Guess that's why I'd be a horrible scout. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 23-Sep-2008 23:16 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Diablo DBL-1A |
| Rating: |
4.00 |
| Comment: |
And yet again I am amazed at seeing such a simple yet amazing design.
I can just imagine a lance of these babies in an urban environment.
I have always had a soft spot for the hunchback with it's one big gun. I like how the gun is able to flip. That coupled with it's jump provides an amazing arc of fire in an urban setting.
I do like how well the fluff goes with this as well. All in all an impressive job. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 23-Sep-2008 23:16 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Ajax A1-A4S |
| Rating: |
4.00 |
| Comment: |
I don't think I've ever read something that made so much sense to me in my life! JK ^^
I do enjoy the design. It''s simple yet beautiful and the fluff accompanying it couldn't feel more right. I felt like I was reading something straight from a TRO.
Good job sir. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 19-Sep-2008 19:54 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
Zeus ZEU-9X |
| Rating: |
3.50 |
| Comment: |
Avery nice upgrade. While I see the reasoning behind the large, I still can't help but feel an ER version to be more appropriate. Besides the obvious increase in firepower, I must say that the added jump jets is my favorite feature on this classic. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review : 19-Sep-2008 19:54 |
|
|
1 out of 1 users (100.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| BattleMech: |
1A Class Instruction Mech SUPER-6000L |
| Rating: |
0.50 |
| Comment: |
Wow! Equipment placement, heat dissipation, cost, speed, armor... the list just goes on and on! A definite 5 for fluff but the mech itself is a 0. But for the concept alone I can't bring myself to rate it such so Ill give it a .5 ^^ |
| A topic has been started for this review [Read Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
