| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Gangrene
Federated Suns
Leftenant General
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 939
Location: United States
|
 Posted: 28-Jun-2002 17:06 Post subject: non-simultaneous fire? |
  |
|
Has anyone here heard of or used any alternative rules for determining firing order? Something that does not involve assuming units fire simultaneously.
_________________
Gangrene
|
|
| Back to top |
 
|
Jade_Dragon
8th Sword of Light
Sho-sho
Joined: 05-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 1325
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 28-Jun-2002 17:23 Post subject: non-simultaneous fire? |
|
|
Whoever wins init fires first.
_________________
The JadeDragon
|
|
| Back to top |
|
chihawk
Clan Blood Spirit
Master Bartender
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 8072
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 28-Jun-2002 17:37 Post subject: non-simultaneous fire? |
|
|
It's part of the Solaris rules...
_________________
www.210sportsblog.com
|
|
| Back to top |
  
|
Gangrene
Federated Suns
Leftenant General
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 939
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 28-Jun-2002 18:10 Post subject: non-simultaneous fire? |
|
|
That's lame, and puts too much emphasis on initiative.
_________________
Gangrene
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Mordel
Mordel.Net
Administrator
Joined: 03-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 6061
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 28-Jun-2002 21:24 Post subject: non-simultaneous fire? |
|
|
What exactly are you trying to accomplish? You could always do it the way it's actually published and have both players declare their fire before they fire. Write it down on a sheet, then fire. Something like that. I guess I don't understand what the purpose you are trying to get at is.
_________________
Mordel Blacknight - Site Administrator
|
|
| Back to top |
 
|
chihawk
Clan Blood Spirit
Master Bartender
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 8072
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 28-Jun-2002 21:26 Post subject: non-simultaneous fire? |
|
|
I think he was just asking if a system like that existed. 
_________________
www.210sportsblog.com
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Mordel
Mordel.Net
Administrator
Joined: 03-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 6061
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 28-Jun-2002 22:47 Post subject: non-simultaneous fire? |
|
|
Smart ass...
_________________
Mordel Blacknight - Site Administrator
|
|
| Back to top |
|
chihawk
Clan Blood Spirit
Master Bartender
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 8072
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 28-Jun-2002 22:56 Post subject: non-simultaneous fire? |
|
|
Thanks boss, I try. 
_________________
www.210sportsblog.com
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Gangrene
Federated Suns
Leftenant General
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 939
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 29-Jun-2002 01:53 Post subject: non-simultaneous fire? |
|
|
Quote:
|
I guess I don't understand what the purpose you are trying to get at is.
|
|
I was just wondering if a system existed for mech combat where firing (and hence damage resolution) was not considered simultaneous. The simultaneous system works ok for slugging matches, but is restrictive for hit and run tactics. I'm pretty sure clickytech will not be simultaneous, but I wanted to try something more akin to classic Btech before looking to Wizkids for an answer.
_________________
Gangrene
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Mordel
Mordel.Net
Administrator
Joined: 03-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 6061
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 29-Jun-2002 07:32 Post subject: non-simultaneous fire? |
|
|
Then the initiative system is the best you'll get, I would imagine.
_________________
Mordel Blacknight - Site Administrator
|
|
| Back to top |
|
CampingCarl
Free Worlds League
Master Sergeant
Joined: 24-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 176
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 29-Jun-2002 10:15 Post subject: non-simultaneous fire? |
|
|
| The deck of cards system works pretty well in my opinion.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
chihawk
Clan Blood Spirit
Master Bartender
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 8072
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 29-Jun-2002 10:17 Post subject: non-simultaneous fire? |
|
|
But in that system (presuming you're talking about the way we do it at TotalCon) even though we declare/fire by initiative the damage is still simultaneous.
_________________
www.210sportsblog.com
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
