|
Mordel's Bar & Grill |
|
  |
» |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Karagin
Imperial Karagin Army
Imperial General
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 4120
Location: United States
|
 Posted: 08-Dec-2006 13:52 Post subject: SAMs in BT...or the lack of them... |
  |
|
A few months ago, during a game, my aerospace fighter was taken out by a SAM, which was nothing more then an Arrow IV uses as a SAM.
Now do you folks think this a good idea or should something like the Thunderblot missiles be used?
Any ideas on rules for this usage?
_________________
Karagin
Only the dead have seen the end of war. - Plato
"Wasted trip Man. Nobody said nuthin' about lockin' horns with no tigers." Oddball
|
|
| Back to top |
  
|
Vagabond
Mercenary
Mr. Referee
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 5724
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 08-Dec-2006 14:19 Post subject: RE: SAMs in BT...or the lack of them... |
|
|
Quote:
|
On 2006-12-08 13:52, Karagin wrote:
A few months ago, during a game, my aerospace fighter was taken out by a SAM, which was nothing more then an Arrow IV uses as a SAM.
Now do you folks think this a good idea or should something like the Thunderblot missiles be used?
Any ideas on rules for this usage?
|
|
i'd say that in addition to those possabilities, an atmospheric variant of the Barracuda missile could be used.
If you were going to use this, however, i would insure a way for a pilot to avoid them with evasive manuvers and flip the restriction on such missiles not being able to fire into space. In addition, i would convert its range from AT2 space to AT2 atmospheric, but that is kinda a duh coversion isn't it.
The Barracuda is the only missile that can target fighters and gets a -2 to-hit. You would also do 20 pts of damage [standard] and force a crit chance. And they could fired at their target from 50 atmo hexes away, which is some major interdiction. It should be too with a 30t missile fired from a 90t launcher, which means it will be an immobile launcher unless you use lvl3 super heavy tanks and trailors.
But I will agree that BT, which has only grown more obvious since i started messing with AT2, has a distinct lack of what we would consider more conventional missiles and this is fine for BT but is not so much in AT2.
_________________
one must work hard to cultivate the mind and body. and one must always cultivate the mind.
//^(^_^)^\\
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Rudel Gurken
Allisters Light Thunder
Major
Joined: 15-Jun-2005 00:00
Posts: 1456
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: 08-Dec-2006 14:31 Post subject: RE: SAMs in BT...or the lack of them... |
|
|
Some ideas of mine (a bit disarranged though  )
A Thunderbolt can be used with the normal rules concerning ground units attacking aerospace units.
Its somewhat hampered by its range though as the range to an airborne target is counted in a different way as normal (I've the Total Warefare rules before my eyes here). So Thunderbolts would have acceptable odds only against fighters at an altitude up to about 5 (on the low altitude map).
Maybe you can introduce a special Arrow IV ammo that only can target jet driven (I mean things with a really hot exhaust!) units at altitudes from 4 up.
I would reduce the damage to 15 or maybe 10 because it needs some guiding equipment as you can't fire it without at that ranges!
There has to be some to hit roll for the missile itself (As the firing unit won`t have much influence at the time of impact) maybe something like the actual to-hit roll for teleoperated missiles.
Guidance from the firing unit isn`t a good idea at that ranges (except you want to introduce some long range radar equipment) and a true "fire-and-forget" missile would be too powerfull!
Edit: Oh, and maybe some automatic crit!
Seems like Vagabond can write faster than I
[ This Message was edited by: Rudel Gurken on 2006-12-08 14:36 ]
_________________
Reality is where the Pizza-man comes from!'Gucken, petzen, verpissen!' (Look at it, squeal it, get the hell away from it!) – Motto of the recon troops'Artillery doesn´t know friend or foe! They only know worthwhile targets!‘ – Kuritan Infantrist
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Gunslinger Patch
Royal Black Watch Regiment
Major
Joined: 04-Mar-2002 00:00
Posts: 1611
|
| Posted: 18-Dec-2006 05:23 Post subject: RE: SAMs in BT...or the lack of them... |
|
|
What I did was just make up a missile, a 10 pointer built to be a SAM. And then built a vehicle to shoot them out of a box laucher, one that has to be externally reloaded. I gave it good targeting at aircraft, and less good targeting at mechs and tanks.
And I used the same missile on fighter wing mounts, give conventional aerospace some better punch against space aerospace fighters. And I think somewhere I made a rule for a mech shooting it from a one-shot tube.
_________________
"Those who beat their guns into plows will plow for those with guns..." -Thomas Jefferson
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Seraph
Blighted Sun Battalion
2nd Company
"Seraph's Slaughter"
Major
Joined: 11-Mar-2004 00:00
Posts: 1744
|
| Posted: 18-Dec-2006 17:58 Post subject: RE: SAMs in BT...or the lack of them... |
|
|
Sounds like an excellent mod for a Rifleman or JagerMech. Fluff-wise at least as they had the super tracking systems capable of tracking such fast moving targets with any real hope of hitting. But as someone here constantly points out..."Fluff has nothing to do with the game what-so-ever." 
_________________
If ignorance is bliss, then why are you so miserable?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Rarich
Federated Suns
Leftenant General
Joined: 05-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 991
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 19-Dec-2006 07:45 Post subject: RE: SAMs in BT...or the lack of them... |
|
|
I would agree with the Barracuda for the Planetary defense batteries. Maybe attach a booster to it if you want to get shots at capitol ships......(another 5 tons worth?) but I like them as outlined against fighters.
I would think something along the lines of an Arrow IV modified specifically for anti aerospace duty would do nicely. Nothing below altitude 4 and no ground target capability, maybe a bonus Vs the speed modifiers of a fighter?
_________________
Duct tape is like the force. It has a light side & a dark side, and strings also lie under it all.
Life is a sexually transmitted terminal disease.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| |
» |
All times are GMT-05:00 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
|
|
|
|
