| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Add iOS Launcher as standard equipment? |
| Yes |
|
14% |
[ 1 ] |
| Yes, but only if hot loaded |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| No |
|
57% |
[ 4 ] |
| Other [please explain] |
|
28% |
[ 2 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 7 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Vagabond
Mercenary
Mr. Referee
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 5724
Location: United States
|
 Posted: 22-Apr-2007 22:12 Post subject: OS Launchers |
  |
|
Given the recent Tech Manual, the numerous amounts of new technology, and the addition of Rocket Launchers, how many here think that they should make the iOS Missile launchers standard equipment? How about if they where hot loaded [blew up if crited]?
for those who do not remember, the iOS launcher took a standard missile launcher [srm, stsrm, lrm, or mrm with any ammo type] and shaved off 0.5t of weight. This meant that an IS SRM-2 iOS weighed 0.5t.
_________________
one must work hard to cultivate the mind and body. and one must always cultivate the mind.
//^(^_^)^\\
|
|
| Back to top |
  
|
Karagin
Imperial Karagin Army
Imperial General
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 4120
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 22-Apr-2007 22:54 Post subject: |
|
|
Sure why not...it's not like the OS shot weapons are there already so why not give the iOS stuff the chance to see the light of day...more stuff for the munchkins to abuse...
To bad the rules don't let you jettison OS stuff one they are used, but then again I am not a fan OS stuff on mechs...vehicles sure and BA/Protos makes sense, but mechs just don't seem like that kind of unit...
_________________
Karagin
Only the dead have seen the end of war. - Plato
"Wasted trip Man. Nobody said nuthin' about lockin' horns with no tigers." Oddball
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Stinger
The Knights of Chaos
General
Joined: 30-Apr-2002 00:00
Posts: 1833
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 23-Apr-2007 00:03 Post subject: |
|
|
I think OS launchers are a real waste, improving them is a waste of resources imo.
_________________
Stinger
If it's "creepy" to use the Internet, military satellites, and robot aircraft to find a house full of gorgeous young models so I can drop in on them unexpected, then FINE, I'm "creepy". Howard Wolowitz. BBT.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Rudel Gurken
Allisters Light Thunder
Major
Joined: 15-Jun-2005 00:00
Posts: 1456
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: 23-Apr-2007 00:58 Post subject: |
|
|
I've voted for "Other" as I think even the iOS launchers are too heavy for what they offer! (Especially the bigger ones!)
I would use this launchers if they were not only 0,5t lighter but 50% lighter!
That would leave an SRM-2 iOS at 0,5t and would drop an LRM-20 iOS from unacceptable 9,5t to a barely acceptable 5t.
_________________
Reality is where the Pizza-man comes from!'Gucken, petzen, verpissen!' (Look at it, squeal it, get the hell away from it!) – Motto of the recon troops'Artillery doesn´t know friend or foe! They only know worthwhile targets!‘ – Kuritan Infantrist
|
|
| Back to top |
|
CO_17thRecon
Kell Hounds
Major
Joined: 10-Sep-2002 00:00
Posts: 1297
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 23-Apr-2007 07:15 Post subject: |
|
|
Given the addition of rocket launchers, it seems kind of pointless to me. I'm already a great fan of rocket launchers, at least, when dealing with troops of at least veteran level. Regular troops have trouble with them, and green troops ought to stay well clear.
_________________
Jarylan Blackwell
"What the...?! Where did you get THAT?!"
"Creative aquisition."
|
|
| Back to top |
|
AWAD
Draconis Combine
Chu-sa
Joined: 06-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 766
|
| Posted: 24-Apr-2007 22:07 Post subject: |
|
|
In general the OS system was a waste. The wieght savings for OS or iOS is useless. Rocket Launchers take that place. Maybe a different version Rocket Launcher for other functions would be better. Plus we have so many new weapons coming on line we need to control it before we have to have a 50 page weapons manual and the game bogs down.
AWAD- Micro Missiles are the key
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Sleeping Dragon
Draconis Combine
Tai-i
Joined: 06-Apr-2005 00:00
Posts: 4820
Location: Czech Republic
|
| Posted: 25-Apr-2007 01:51 Post subject: |
|
|
Voted for other.
There was a topic concerning the OS launchers some time ago and I and Rudel were both for halving the launcher size, not just 0.5 down. That is simply a waste on anything bigger than SRM-2.
Can anyone reasonably explain why does a standard SRM with 100 missiles weight 2t and OS SRM with 2 missiles and without ammo feeder weight 1.5t?
_________________
The dragon NEVER sleeps!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Vagabond
Mercenary
Mr. Referee
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 5724
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 25-Apr-2007 11:53 Post subject: |
|
|
| Sleeping Dragon wrote: | Voted for other.
There was a topic concerning the OS launchers some time ago and I and Rudel were both for halving the launcher size, not just 0.5 down. That is simply a waste on anything bigger than SRM-2.
Can anyone reasonably explain why does a standard SRM with 100 missiles weight 2t and OS SRM with 2 missiles and without ammo feeder weight 1.5t? |
The TechManual has this to say:
"the single-shot missile launcher design simply modifies a standard missile launch system with a shortened, fixed mount ammo bin carrying a one-salvo capacity."
Otherwise, it still has the ammo feeder. it is just shortened alot. Stupid really.
| wrote: | | AWAD- Micro Missiles are the key |
I have always enjoyed my micro-missile launcher ideas.
_________________
one must work hard to cultivate the mind and body. and one must always cultivate the mind.
//^(^_^)^\\
|
|
| Back to top |
|
DarkAdder
Clan Star Adder
Star Commander
Joined: 10-Jan-2004 00:00
Posts: 604
|
| Posted: 25-Apr-2007 22:42 Post subject: |
|
|
It sounds like the ammo feeder IS the bin. The feed link is just long enough to hold the ammo, and thats it.
Does anyone know the cost in C-bills for OS systems, as opposed to their full size counterparts, and the rocket launchers? My books are in a state of dissaray, as most of them are still in Vancouver, ATM... 
_________________
Meddle not in the affairs of Dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
