| Search found 101 matches |
|
| Author |
Message |
 Topic: |
McBride
Replies: 8
Views: 5822
|
 Forum: General Discussion Posted: 21-Apr-2006 12:18 Subject: RE: C3 Company |
| The Tai-sho is a nice company-level C3 command mech. A little on the slow side, but it has enough long range weaponry to defend itself and maxed armour.
There's also the WFT-C Wolftrap, essentially t ... |
| Topic: |
McBride
Replies: 3
Views: 4606
|
Forum: Design Submissions Posted: 26-Mar-2006 22:09 Subject: RE: Moccasin |
| Man... I still have my GI Joes from when I was a kid... them and transformers.
Anyhow... It's a nifty little craft, I'd certainly use it if I was defensive in a campaign. I could see it being useful ... |
| Topic: |
McBride
Replies: 53
Views: 46602
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: 18-Mar-2006 16:19 Subject: RE: The most OVER-rated mech? |
| The Awesome is another exception to that, It can fire all 3 PPCs every other round, and fire two every round with heat to spare. |
| Topic: |
McBride
Replies: 5
Views: 4917
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: 08-Feb-2006 19:42 Subject: RE: Patton Tank or Rommel Tank |
| Against mechs neither of them are terribly useful. Meaning that the main role of the both of them should be hit and fade or anti-tank duty. With a move of only 4/6, they won't be able to retreat fast ... |
| Topic: |
McBride
Replies: 16
Views: 11261
|
Forum: Design Submissions Posted: 08-Feb-2006 19:28 Subject: RE: Wolfsbane WLB-5S2 |
| AC ammo is in the leg because it has better protection there than in the torsos and in the trial runs I had, it wasn't a problem. Besides, by the time you take 43 points of damage to one leg, in most ... |
| Topic: |
McBride
Replies: 16
Views: 11261
|
Forum: Design Submissions Posted: 08-Feb-2006 14:07 Subject: RE: Wolfsbane WLB-5S2 |
| If you use HMPro, you need to go to the MM webpage and download a program there that converts the files. I don't remember if there are any other design programs supported. It tells you on the MM webpa ... |
| Topic: |
McBride
Replies: 16
Views: 11261
|
Forum: Design Submissions Posted: 08-Feb-2006 11:27 Subject: RE: Wolfsbane WLB-5S2 |
| It also already has 5 MLs for close range fighting.
As a side note, I tested it out in MM last night. Against a Victor (don't remember the model, BVs were close though) it won 2 out of 3 matches, aga ... |
| Topic: |
McBride
Replies: 16
Views: 11261
|
Forum: Design Submissions Posted: 07-Feb-2006 18:02 Subject: RE: Wolfsbane WLB-5S2 |
| Same series of mech ideas, but not another model of the same mech. Sorry, wasn't entirely clear. |
| Topic: |
McBride
Replies: 16
Views: 11261
|
Forum: Design Submissions Posted: 07-Feb-2006 14:37 Subject: RE: Wolfsbane WLB-5S2 |
| I was thinking of making a second mech to the series, once I figure out fluff and stuff, that's more suited to close in fighting. It'll be a little lighter and maybe faster. |
| Topic: |
McBride
Replies: 16
Views: 11261
|
Forum: Design Submissions Posted: 07-Feb-2006 10:45 Subject: RE: Wolfsbane WLB-5S2 |
| LIke I said, I just threw it together, I didn't change the date or anything. Once I get some ideas for fluff I'm going to set a proper date. |
| Topic: |
McBride
Replies: 16
Views: 11261
|
Forum: Design Submissions Posted: 06-Feb-2006 18:16 Subject: RE: Wolfsbane WLB-5S2 |
| Idea behind the standard AC and 3 tons of ammo was to take advantage of the various kinds of special ammo available. |
| Topic: |
McBride
Replies: 16
Views: 11261
|
Forum: Design Submissions Posted: 05-Feb-2006 00:27 Subject: Wolfsbane WLB-5S2 |
| No fluff as of yet, just something I threw together and then ended up liking.
BattleMech Technical Readout
Type/Model: Wolfsbane WLB-5S2
Tech: Inner Sphere / 3058
Config ... |
| Topic: |
McBride
Replies: 53
Views: 46602
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: 04-Feb-2006 18:17 Subject: RE: The most OVER-rated mech? |
| I find that the Stone Rhino/Behemoth gets far too much hype for what it's worth. I find I have no problems dealing with it, despite what the local Clan players have to say about it. Another Clan mech ... |
| Topic: |
McBride
Replies: 20
Views: 15726
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: 03-Feb-2006 22:01 Subject: RE: Worst Battlemech Design |
| I find the Shadow Hawk in general is a piece of junk. Almost anything that can be done with a SHD, can be done better with a Pheonix Hawk, the only thing it doesn't do better is dissipate heat.
The V ... |
| Topic: |
McBride
Replies: 21
Views: 14331
|
Forum: Design Submissions Posted: 02-Feb-2006 13:42 Subject: RE: User Review: Strider SR1-OG, or Pistols at Dawn |
| As I interpret it, the crits taken up by FF isn't the armour itself, but more by extra mounting points and the like, which would in turn explain why they're fixed. |
