|
Mordel's Bar & Grill |
|
  |
» |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Kalo Osis
Clan Ice Hellions
Star Colonel
Joined: 07-Jul-2005 00:00
Posts: 446
|
 Posted: 08-Feb-2006 17:13 Post subject: Patton Tank or Rommel Tank |
  |
|
Well here is a topic probably discussed before. Which is better, the Patton or the RommeL They are very similar tanks. Both have the same speed, same manufacturer, same weight, but differing amounts of firepower and armor. The Patton has more armor and more range, but sacrafices the punch of the larger cannon carried by the Rommel. Both have a Small Laser and LRM 5 pack, but the Patton also has a flamer to better deal with infantry. All in all, the Rommel has more firepower while the Patton has more armor. So cast a vote, and tell my why you picked that particular tank
_________________
"I prefer to fight for a meaningful purpose, rather than to provide a spectacle for the ignorant masses."
-Kalo on the Solaris 7 Battlemech Arenas
|
|
| Back to top |
 
|
McBride
Draconis Combine
Shujin
Joined: 06-Nov-2004 00:00
Posts: 101
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: 08-Feb-2006 19:42 Post subject: RE: Patton Tank or Rommel Tank |
|
|
Against mechs neither of them are terribly useful. Meaning that the main role of the both of them should be hit and fade or anti-tank duty. With a move of only 4/6, they won't be able to retreat fast enough for hit and fade to be effective.
Using strictly level two vehicle rules, I have to go with the Patton. The longer range on it's AC/10 gives it that much more time to crit something like the Rommel to death.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Nightmare
Lyran Alliance
Kommandant-General
Joined: 03-May-2002 00:00
Posts: 2214
|
| Posted: 09-Feb-2006 00:15 Post subject: RE: Patton Tank or Rommel Tank |
|
|
Rommel all the way. I don't use this type of vehicle except in defense or ambushes, so the short range is no drawback.
_________________
A tree fall in the forest, and no one is around, and it hits a mime. Does anyone care?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Sleeping Dragon
Draconis Combine
Tai-i
Joined: 06-Apr-2005 00:00
Posts: 4820
Location: Czech Republic
|
| Posted: 10-Feb-2006 05:43 Post subject: RE: Patton Tank or Rommel Tank |
|
|
Rommel, AC/20 is ... well AC/20. I wouldn't take these vehicles anywhere outside of city or other defensive positions without working on them a little.
[ This Message was edited by: Sleeping Dragon on 2006-02-10 05:44 ]
_________________
The dragon NEVER sleeps!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Nightmare
Lyran Alliance
Kommandant-General
Joined: 03-May-2002 00:00
Posts: 2214
|
| Posted: 10-Feb-2006 09:30 Post subject: RE: Patton Tank or Rommel Tank |
|
|
Quote:
|
On 2006-02-10 05:43, Sleeping Dragon wrote:
Rommel, AC/20 is ... well AC/20. I wouldn't take these vehicles anywhere outside of city or other defensive positions without working on them a little.
|
|
Hide them in basements and shoot the legs off invading mechs. 
_________________
A tree fall in the forest, and no one is around, and it hits a mime. Does anyone care?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
ICER
Clan Hell's Horses
Galaxy Commander
Joined: 04-Feb-2002 00:00
Posts: 1663
Location: United States
|
| Posted: 10-Feb-2006 09:50 Post subject: RE: Patton Tank or Rommel Tank |
|
|
Rommel. They have always made me pay dearly for engaging them. and although I have always beaten them, it was always a bittersweet victory
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| |
» |
All times are GMT-04:00 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
|
|
|
|
