|
Member Review - Rudel Gurken : 16-Apr-2008 18:02 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
2.50 |
| Comment: |
A rather bad upgrade in my eyes. It has two more SRM's and an additional ton of ammo but it lost two valuable jump jets in that process. I too don't understand why the LRM was relocated into the head. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - Sleeping Dragon : 22-Jan-2008 09:34 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
2.50 |
| Comment: |
I'm not fond of the ASN-101 and this one resembles it a bit too much for my taste.The additional SRMs are a nice move, but I wonder whether it was a good idea to lose Jump Jets. Moving LRMs to the head also seems strange, with ASN-21 fluff mentioning how cramped the cockpit was and moving the ammo to CT looks more like preparing yourself for a suicide. It's a pretty good concept, but the imperfections you installed ruin it for me. (I don't think that JJs or LRM relocation were 'accidental' decisions like on many other machines. You think while designing, but I don't appreciate neither moving prominent design features just to fill a crit in the head slot nor placement of the ammo in 'safe' CT.) |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - Khayman : 05-Aug-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
2.00 |
| Comment: |
I feel as though, everything I was about to say, was said already by Adder. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - DarkAdder : 09-Jul-2005 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
2.00 |
| Comment: |
As the ASN's go, its middle of the road. About the only really -new- thing on this mech is the addition of the SRMs. For up close and dirty fighting, this is going to be fairly brutal.
In just about every other respect, its the same ASN with a new coat of paint. While its not my first choice for a 40 ton skirmisher, I wouldnt feel put out using them in combat, either. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - mud : 03-Oct-2004 00:00 |
|
|
0 out of 0 users (0.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
2.50 |
| Comment: |
An average modification; still, you could definitely do better with an upgrade you're building from the ground up. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|