|
Member Review - Rudel Gurken : 10-Mar-2006 00:00 |
|
|
1 out of 1 users (100.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
3.50 |
| Comment: |
This variant looses some striking-power but can support units with Arrow IV or semiguided LRM´s.
Still a good scout but strike-runs will get less effective.
|
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - Nightmare : 13-Jul-2005 00:00 |
|
|
1 out of 1 users (100.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
4.00 |
| Comment: |
I'll disagree on the "dying immediately after using the TAG". This spotter doesn't actually have to be the closest to the enemy thanks to the C3 network! That's what I call unfair, getting clobbered by C3 mechs AND laser-guided munitions at the same time.
The missing hands aren't quite as annoying in a spotter, but I've found another complaint. The TAG could be placed in a hand for a wider field of fire. Other than that this is a perfect spotter for units containing the base model. My arguments for using the 3K hold true for the 3K1. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - Blackhand : 11-Jul-2005 00:00 |
|
|
1 out of 1 users (100.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
1.00 |
| Comment: |
Much less impressive, as soon as this thing attracts real attention when it uses its TAG system. You'll see it die within seconds.
It doesn't have the survivability factor that other mechs have because of uncased ammo, light mech armour, and an expensive extra light engine to boot.
If I had to take a lightning I'd take the stock model but not by much. Most cannon designs seem more capable or more survivable depending on whether you want to keep the XL engine or not. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - Motown Scrapper : 04-Jul-2005 00:00 |
|
|
1 out of 1 users (100.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
2.50 |
| Comment: |
This mech has excellent speed and an impressive electronics package and good heat control. But the weapon throw weight is somewhat light and the armour is thin and the uncased ammo increases the vulnerability and the ECM only partialy offsets that.You would have been better off droping the missile system instead of the laser and adding more armour. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
MASC 4. Gyro 4.
MASC 5. Gyro 5.
Write Review