|
Member Review - Jade_Dragon : 02-Oct-2013 14:56 |
|
|
1 out of 1 users (100.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
4.50 |
| Comment: |
Good fluff, that is why the score is as high as it is. It is refreshing to have a history on why this machine is designed as is and why one is very unlikely to face in combat. The Notable Personalities section is especially well done.
The Mech itself is a solid design, something that is even more rare, a pleasant change. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - CO_17thRecon : 24-Jan-2008 13:33 |
|
|
1 out of 1 users (100.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
4.00 |
| Comment: |
Good agility and speed, combined with heavy close hitting power make this machine a superb brawler. Armor protection is superb too. The LRM-5 is a bit like icing on a cake, nice, but not the reason you get it. Token long range harassment is good though. Pick away at the helpless long enough and you can break their morale, if you're patient.
Overall, the design suffers only from the problem that many quads have: vulnerability to rear attacks. Devoting significant weaponry to the aft quarters is difficult however, thus, in most cases it behooves you just to make sure the quad is never working alone, and is thus resistant to such attacks due to the presence of lance mates.
Overall, good machine. I do like seeing nice quads. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|
|
Member Review - Rudel Gurken : 22-Jan-2008 19:25 |
|
|
1 out of 1 users (100.00%) have found this review useful
|
|
|
| Rating: |
3.50 |
| Comment: |
Quite nice Quad. It has no real heavy weapon but has some combined punch close up. The LRM is more of a gimmick than a weapon but i like plinking away with such a thing! Like every Quad it has problems with its narrow field of fire but the JJ's give it more options to avoid having an enemy in its blind spots. The heavy armor is a good idea on such a close-range fighter too. |
| No topic has been started for this review [Start Topic] |
|
|
|
|